Subject | RE: Re: [firebird-support] Web site usage |
---|---|
Author | Gary T. Benner |
Post date | 2008-05-13T09:03:40Z |
[Reply]
HI Robert,
At 10:39 on 13/05/2008 you wrote
Personally I use FB with S/S on large sites with no issue.
However with FB and IB going >different ways do you think there might be future issues with the native >IB drivers in PHP?
The basics won't change, and most people still only use the basics. And who knows what Embarcadero will do????
The only issue I've found is with blobs ( make sure you have the latest version of PHP - there were some dicky ones a while back that stuffed up blob access ).
kr
gary
Ref#: 41006
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
HI Robert,
At 10:39 on 13/05/2008 you wrote
>I don't know a whole lot about web sites but thought a 1000+ hits a >second was quite large, don't really know. SS Sounds good, esp when 3.0 >is released (been waiting for this baby).Any analysis of web site use has to be done carefully as 1000 online users does not equate to 1000 hits a second - more likely 50 - 80 depending on the site - and also remember the difference between hits and sessions. Where the webserver serves PHP pages and other files (images), the latter can be quite easily moved to a "media server" so as to leave your DB server alone.
Personally I use FB with S/S on large sites with no issue.
However with FB and IB going >different ways do you think there might be future issues with the native >IB drivers in PHP?
The basics won't change, and most people still only use the basics. And who knows what Embarcadero will do????
The only issue I've found is with blobs ( make sure you have the latest version of PHP - there were some dicky ones a while back that stuffed up blob access ).
>Agreed!
>I think I tried the PDO driver but it was DOA (i.e. I couldn't even >connect).
>
>FB is sounding like its the go :)
kr
gary
Ref#: 41006
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]