Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Web site usage |
---|---|
Author | Robert martin |
Post date | 2008-05-12T22:38:29Z |
Thanks Thomas
I don't know a whole lot about web sites but thought a 1000+ hits a
second was quite large, don't really know. SS Sounds good, esp when 3.0
is released (been waiting for this baby). However with FB and IB going
different ways do you think there might be future issues with the native
IB drivers in PHP?
I think I tried the PDO driver but it was DOA (i.e. I couldn't even
connect).
FB is sounding like its the go :)
--
Rob Martin
Software Engineer
phone +64 03 377 0495
fax +64 03 377 0496
web www.chreos.com
Wild Software Ltd
Thomas Woinke wrote:
I don't know a whole lot about web sites but thought a 1000+ hits a
second was quite large, don't really know. SS Sounds good, esp when 3.0
is released (been waiting for this baby). However with FB and IB going
different ways do you think there might be future issues with the native
IB drivers in PHP?
I think I tried the PDO driver but it was DOA (i.e. I couldn't even
connect).
FB is sounding like its the go :)
--
Rob Martin
Software Engineer
phone +64 03 377 0495
fax +64 03 377 0496
web www.chreos.com
Wild Software Ltd
Thomas Woinke wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Robert martin <rob@...> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> 1) Should I even be considering FB for a web site will a v high hit rate.
>>
> I don'n know what you consider a high hit rate, but the site I am
> running gets about 300000 hits a day.
> It runs on Firebird 2.0.4 SuperServer and FB handles the load very well.
>
>
>> 2) I like the concept behind SS but understand that Classic is better on
>> multi cpu machines. If I have 1000 simultaneous hits this means 1000
>> instances of FB under classic? would I be better with SS under this
>> circumstance?
>>
> Since the common scenario would be many connections with short
> transactions I chose SuperServer and am going fine. On the downside,
> SuperServer will not make use of multiple CPUs or cores. Classic might
> be an option for web apps if you are able to use persistent
> connections or some sort of connection pool to keep the number of FB
> instances controllable.
> I would consider SuperServer as the choice for the common Apache/PHP combo.
>
>
>> 3) What is the best way to connect to FB from PHP? I tried a number of
>> methods but they were buggy (I couldn't even connect) and ended up using
>> the native IB drivers. I don't like this as a solution. Do I have to
>> do ODBC? will it be up to large loads?
>>
> The native IB extension is fine and the way to go. An alternative
> might be the Firebird/interbase-PDO-driver, but I can't say anything
> about it's stability because I went with the interbase extension and
> never looked back since.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> /thomas
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>