Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird Python driver |
---|---|
Author | Pavel Cisar |
Post date | 2008-10-28T16:24:31Z |
peter_jacobi.rm napsal(a):
builds (I don't have Visual Studio).
Subversion), but it's outdated (doesn't contain protocol enhancements
made in FB 2.x) and it's not really easy to understand either. I found
that the best information source is to read JayBird sources (all this
low-level stuff is in single file). However, JayBird also doesn't
implement the latest enhancements.
discussed in depth (no impl. proposal) so it's not on the Roadmap up to
3.0 version.
best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix
>As far as I know, yes. With help of Philippe Makowski who makes Windows
> Are you the last and only one working on Firebird/Python?
builds (I don't have Visual Studio).
> Any hints about kinterbasdb for Python 2.6?I'll ask Philippe to make it.
> And a last question: where is the Firebird wire protocolThere is some documentation in .NET driver (at least it was in
> documented, which the new Python driver is planned to
> be programmed against?
Subversion), but it's outdated (doesn't contain protocol enhancements
made in FB 2.x) and it's not really easy to understand either. I found
that the best information source is to read JayBird sources (all this
low-level stuff is in single file). However, JayBird also doesn't
implement the latest enhancements.
> (I also vaguely remember discussions about a new -- orNope. It was considered as interesting and cool idea, but it wasn't
> additionally layered -- wire protocol, designed to be
> easily targeted, something like REST or XML-RPC or whatever.
> Anything emerged out of this proposal? [Ouch, that was another
> question after the last one])
discussed in depth (no impl. proposal) so it's not on the Roadmap up to
3.0 version.
best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix