Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Re: Face Firebird 1.5.3 performance problem with Intel Core 2 + Windows 2003 |
---|---|
Author | Nigel Weeks |
Post date | 2006-08-18T07:20:47Z |
You still haven't said if your database filename has .fdb or .gdb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Chau Chee Yang
> Sent: Friday, 18 August 2006 4:37 PM
> To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [firebird-support] Re: Face Firebird 1.5.3
> performance problem
> with Intel Core 2 + Windows 2003
>
>
> Sorry for didn't provide enough information for the hardware I use.
> Here are the hardware I used:
>
> 1. Intel Core 2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40Ghz (shown in General Page of System
> Properties
> 2. 1 G RAM (DDR 2 running at 667Mhz)
> 3. MSI P965 Neo Series (MS-7235) Motherboard with Intel P965 Chipset
> 4. SATA 2 200G Hard disk Drive (No Raid)
> 5. Realtek PCI LAN Fast Ethernet 1G
> 6. Operating System: Windows 2003 Standard Edition
>
> I hope the above information helps. The following are testing
> I have done:
>
> 1. When the above machine arrive, I first install the Windows XP
> professional, Firebird 1.5.3 super server and a win32 application
> accessing Firebird database.
>
> 2. I leave the default firebird.conf as is and run the application. It
> is hard to tell you what operations are slow. I did a series of
> calculation that involve connect/disconnect, select, update, delete
> operation to a database. The operation tooks about 17 minutes to
> finish and we are happy with the result. The test has been done for
> few times and the duration for the calculation remains at 17 minutes.
>
> 3. Next, we reformat and install windows 2003 server standard edition
> with Domain Controller installed and Volume Shadow Copy disabled. We
> install Firebird 1.5.3 super server and the Win32 apps again.
>
> 4. Then we carry on with the test on the same database. The
> calculation tooks about 1 hrs and 20 minutes to finish. That is
> unacceptable outcome. It is even slower than normal Pentium
> 4 machine.
>
> 5. I then google to find tuning solution. And I found the
> CPUAffinityMask and Classic Server stuff. I follow the
> instructionaccordingly, but the operation still took more than 1 hr to
> finish.
>
> 6. Next, I reformat the server again and install Windows 2003 standard
> edition WITHOUT installing Domain Controller. This time the test tooks
> 17 minutes to complete. And this is the result we want.
>
> From the above test, shall I conclude that it is the Domain Controller
> of Windows 2003 that cause the problem to Firebird server? Or there
> is anything to tune to overcome this problem.
>
> While doing the testing, I always monitor the memory usage and cpu
> usage from Task Manager. No other process occuping the cpu while the
> test is doing. And there is always enough RAM during the test.
>
> However, I encounter a strange situation. When the test is run on
> Windows 2003 with Domain Controller INSTALLED. The CPU aren't always
> busy with the calculation. It seems like there are some pause between
> the calculation (Not bouncing either). For example:
> cpu usage is 50% - 50% - 1% - 1% - 1% ...... - 50%. The pause at 1%
> spend a significant amount time.
>
> However, this doesn't happen to Windows 2003 installation without
> Domain Controller, the CPU are always busy during the calculation (50%
> - 50% ... 50%). No obvious pause are noticed.
>
> Hope someone here who has similiar configuration that can do the test.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>