Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird and AMD64 |
---|---|
Author | Michael Weissenbacher |
Post date | 2006-05-16T16:11:33Z |
Thanks for your answer,
synthetic testing on it. So far everything has been stable and working
properly. I'll do some real-world testing in the next days to see if it
fails there. If no problems occur I think I'm gonna stick with it, my
fingers crossed. Daily backups are made anyway and the DB doesn't see
frequent updates.
problems I may find with 2.0.
kind regards,
Michael
>> - Use the latest Firebird 2 RC2 (is it stable yet?)I've successfully installed FB2 RC2 and I'm currently running some heavy
>
> A release candidate is a build that is still in test, but which
> resolved all the issues raised by the beta test and and, pending
> testing, may be the final release.
synthetic testing on it. So far everything has been stable and working
properly. I'll do some real-world testing in the next days to see if it
fails there. If no problems occur I think I'm gonna stick with it, my
fingers crossed. Daily backups are made anyway and the DB doesn't see
frequent updates.
> You can run the 32 bit images with no problems at all. There areWhat exactly do you mean with images? The pre-built packages?
> problems with the native 64 bit version Firebird 1.5, and serious
> problems with mixing 32 and 64 bit images.
> Since Firebird doesn't make heavy use of large memories, what II'll keep that as the fallback option. This way I can report any
> would do is install the 32-bit V1.5, then after 2.0 has been released,
> upgrade to it then add the RAM.
problems I may find with 2.0.
kind regards,
Michael