Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: problem using backup (Classic vs SuperServer) |
---|---|
Author | Fabian Chocron |
Post date | 2004-02-04T12:44:46Z |
> > I have tested it, and Classic Server is far much faster thanmore
> > SuperServer (On
> > Windows 2K Server, and I guess on XP & NT too, but i doubt on 95/98/Me).
> >
> > Also, you can use more than 1 CPU on Classic, but you will need much
> > RAM. Basicly, proper Microsofts OS (NT & 2K) will perform much betterwith
> > multiple "instances" of a program rather than a simple Application withIt depends your configuration and the amounth of users, and the database,
> > "Internal Threading". On the other hand, SuperServer will save lots of
> > money
> > in terms of RAM and CPU.
> about how much RAM are we talking about?
and the level of queries, and the structure of the DB, but generaly speaking
I would say you need between double and triple of what you need with SS.
In the case I tested it, with "SS" I need 850K for 50 Users, with Classic I
need about 1.6 Giga
Cheers,
Fabian.