Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: problem using backup (Classic vs SuperServer) |
---|---|
Author | Doru Constantin |
Post date | 2004-02-04T12:38:30Z |
Fabian Chocron wrote:
> I have tested it, and Classic Server is far much faster thanabout how much RAM are we talking about?
> SuperServer (On
> Windows 2K Server, and I guess on XP & NT too, but i doubt on 95/98/Me).
>
> Also, you can use more than 1 CPU on Classic, but you will need much more
> RAM. Basicly, proper Microsofts OS (NT & 2K) will perform much better with
> multiple "instances" of a program rather than a simple Application with
> "Internal Threading". On the other hand, SuperServer will save lots of
> money
> in terms of RAM and CPU.