Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: problem using backup (Classic vs SuperServer) |
---|---|
Author | Fabian Chocron |
Post date | 2004-02-04T09:59:19Z |
> >Will classic perform better than superserver on dual machine? I thinkI have tested it, and Classic Server is far much faster than SuperServer (On
> >so.
>
> I think so (from hearsay) but I haven't had the opportunity to test for
> myself (no SMP boxes here).
Windows 2K Server, and I guess on XP & NT too, but i doubt on 95/98/Me).
Also, you can use more than 1 CPU on Classic, but you will need much more
RAM. Basicly, proper Microsofts OS (NT & 2K) will perform much better with
multiple "instances" of a program rather than a simple Application with
"Internal Threading". On the other hand, SuperServer will save lots of money
in terms of RAM and CPU.
I hope this helps,
Cheers,
Fabian.