Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Interbase 6.X vs Firebird on Server 2003 |
---|---|
Author | Rohit Gupta |
Post date | 2004-01-12T14:17:49Z |
Paul,
we saw a factor of 6 improvement for really busy tasks such as reporting
at more than one site.
Paul Reeves wrote:
we saw a factor of 6 improvement for really busy tasks such as reporting
at more than one site.
Paul Reeves wrote:
>On Monday 12 January 2004 11:04, Rohit Gupta wrote:
>
>
>>2. 2003 classifies IOB/FB as an app even when it runs as a service.
>>If you configure the server to optimise for applications, you will see
>>an enormous boost.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Yeah, but I couldn't reproduce that. Admittedly I only did a very simple
>test - a select from a table with 100k rows. But the performance results
>were similar across Win2k, NT4, Win2K3 and XP. All O/S were VMWare
>sessions on the same hardware with the same memory allocated.
>
>I'm not saying you're wrong, or that you didn't see an improvement but I'd
>like to nail this one down with a concrete, reproducible test case.
>
>
>Paul
>
>