| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Interbase 6.X vs Firebird on Server 2003 |
|---|---|
| Author | Paul Reeves |
| Post date | 2004-01-12T10:30:56Z |
On Monday 12 January 2004 11:04, Rohit Gupta wrote:
test - a select from a table with 100k rows. But the performance results
were similar across Win2k, NT4, Win2K3 and XP. All O/S were VMWare
sessions on the same hardware with the same memory allocated.
I'm not saying you're wrong, or that you didn't see an improvement but I'd
like to nail this one down with a concrete, reproducible test case.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase
>Yeah, but I couldn't reproduce that. Admittedly I only did a very simple
> 2. 2003 classifies IOB/FB as an app even when it runs as a service.
> If you configure the server to optimise for applications, you will see
> an enormous boost.
>
test - a select from a table with 100k rows. But the performance results
were similar across Win2k, NT4, Win2K3 and XP. All O/S were VMWare
sessions on the same hardware with the same memory allocated.
I'm not saying you're wrong, or that you didn't see an improvement but I'd
like to nail this one down with a concrete, reproducible test case.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase