Subject | Re: [firebird-support] IBO, DataPump and Xeon with HT |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2003-09-11T14:06:10Z |
Hi,
At September 11, 2003, 10:22, Marco Lauria wrote:
but still not ready for HT.
would have better performance using Classic Server.
with Windows 2000. So, the CPU affinity might not work as expected.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At September 11, 2003, 10:22, Marco Lauria wrote:
> Hello I encountered a strange problemThis doesn't surprise me, the thread scheduler was improved in FB 1.5,
> under my new machine a Xeon 2.8 with HT Enabled.
> I run the tests with FB 1.03 and FB 1.5 RC4 under Windows XP with latest
> Service Pack and latest Fixes.
> Everything works well when I use my application written using IBO
> but when I use the DataPump function,
> everything hangs up and it transfer data at 6 records per second using FB
> 1.03 and 25 records per seconds using FB 1.5.
but still not ready for HT.
> The code with no HT Enabled runs really faster.That is expected. I think it's in the release notes. You probably
would have better performance using Classic Server.
> I used CPU Affinity to set first CPU 0 and after CPU 1 and from the TaskIf not mistaken, Windows XP operates differently with HT CPUs than
> Manager I can see
> that the FB process has the right affinity (I dunno threads but AFAIK
> child-threads should use the same affinity as the main
> thread).
with Windows 2000. So, the CPU affinity might not work as expected.
> P.S. I don't understand if this is related to IBO or to FB so I amIt's FB related.
> cross-posting on both ibobjects and firebird-support
> lists.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)