Subject | Re: Poor performance of SuperServer 1.5 on Intel XEON Server? |
---|---|
Author | michael welsch |
Post date | 2003-12-03T07:26:48Z |
Hi,
sorry for the missing information.
The OS on the XEON machine is Windows Server 2003.
I tested my application before with the database server running on a
standard PC (P4, 2,2 GHz, 512 MBRam, Windows XP Pro) The client was
connected with this server through our intranet.
Now i moved the database server to the XEON machine and comparing to
the previous performance it is very much slower.
I have no timings, sorry, but it is obvious that something's not OK.
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Carlos H. Cantu"
<listas@w...> wrote:
sorry for the missing information.
The OS on the XEON machine is Windows Server 2003.
I tested my application before with the database server running on a
standard PC (P4, 2,2 GHz, 512 MBRam, Windows XP Pro) The client was
connected with this server through our intranet.
Now i moved the database server to the XEON machine and comparing to
the previous performance it is very much slower.
I have no timings, sorry, but it is obvious that something's not OK.
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Carlos H. Cantu"
<listas@w...> wrote:
> Hi! Reporting my experience with FB 1.5 and HT:performance
>
> I ran FB 1.5 SS on a P4 2.4Ghz HT with Win2K. Testing the
> with a big selectable SP (hundreds of lines of code) FB 1.5 gotalmost
> 20% faster than FB 1.0(this would
>
> I didn't change anything regarding the default configuration and FB
> was (of course) attached to the first "virtual" processor.
>
> Carlos
> http://www.warmboot.com.br
> FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br
>
> DR> Another question. What do you qualify as poor performance
> DR> help us understand what you are referring to)?