Subject Re: [firebird-support] Re: Poor performance of SuperServer 1.5 on Intel XEON Server?
Author Heng Sin Low
Maybe you should try Classic Server.
--- michael welsch <m.welsch@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the missing information.
> The OS on the XEON machine is Windows Server 2003.
>
> I tested my application before with the database server running on a
> standard PC (P4, 2,2 GHz, 512 MBRam, Windows XP Pro) The client was
> connected with this server through our intranet.
>
> Now i moved the database server to the XEON machine and comparing to
> the previous performance it is very much slower.
> I have no timings, sorry, but it is obvious that something's not OK.
>
>
>
>
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Carlos H. Cantu"
> <listas@w...> wrote:
> > Hi! Reporting my experience with FB 1.5 and HT:
> >
> > I ran FB 1.5 SS on a P4 2.4Ghz HT with Win2K. Testing the
> performance
> > with a big selectable SP (hundreds of lines of code) FB 1.5 got
> almost
> > 20% faster than FB 1.0
> >
> > I didn't change anything regarding the default configuration and FB
> > was (of course) attached to the first "virtual" processor.
> >
> > Carlos
> > http://www.warmboot.com.br
> > FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br
> >
> > DR> Another question. What do you qualify as poor performance
> (this would
> > DR> help us understand what you are referring to)?
>
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/