| Subject | Re[2]: [firebird-support] Poor performance of SuperServer 1.5 on Intel XEON Server? |
|---|---|
| Author | Carlos H. Cantu |
| Post date | 2003-12-02T18:56:41Z |
Hi! Reporting my experience with FB 1.5 and HT:
I ran FB 1.5 SS on a P4 2.4Ghz HT with Win2K. Testing the performance
with a big selectable SP (hundreds of lines of code) FB 1.5 got almost
20% faster than FB 1.0
I didn't change anything regarding the default configuration and FB
was (of course) attached to the first "virtual" processor.
Carlos
http://www.warmboot.com.br
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br
DR> Another question. What do you qualify as poor performance(this would
DR> help us understand what you are referring to)?
I ran FB 1.5 SS on a P4 2.4Ghz HT with Win2K. Testing the performance
with a big selectable SP (hundreds of lines of code) FB 1.5 got almost
20% faster than FB 1.0
I didn't change anything regarding the default configuration and FB
was (of course) attached to the first "virtual" processor.
Carlos
http://www.warmboot.com.br
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br
DR> Another question. What do you qualify as poor performance(this would
DR> help us understand what you are referring to)?