Subject Re: [ib-support] New Firebird Release 1.0.0 Beta2 Available
Author Stephen J. Thompson
Hash: SHA1

Hello Mark,

I looked into it and it seems to be as you said it was just the error
message. I have another issue for you though. The install fails on debian
because of the redhat commands in the tar file. In the script SSpostinstall
it has the chkconfig (i think).



On Monday 20 Aug 2001 6:37 pm, you wrote:
> Hi Stephen
> I tried the super installs again, and they worked for me, both .tar.gz
> and .rpm
> is their something special that you did in the install procedure,
> (perhaps disable the scripts from running).
> I'd like to hear if there it still fails, or perhaps if you are over the
> problem.
> Cheers
> Mark
> Stephen J. Thompson wrote:
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >There seems to be a problem with this build. I tried installing it and it
> >doesn't seem to contain the file /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird. I presume
> this is
> >the startup script.
> The startup scripts, are in /opt/interbase/misc/firebird.initd.xxxx
> there are two, one for redhat style machines and one for general init
> scripts. The correct one needs to be copied to the /etc/init.d
> directory and the script file then needs to be edited to ensure the
> correct password for sysdba is specified.
> The 0.9.4 install used to install this file directly into
> /etc/init.d/firebird. The 1.0.0 install does it as part of the
> postinstall script after checking which one is appropriate.
> I had this problem as well, when doing some testing of the install,
> There was a chmod or something that was left from the initial install.
> (install still worked but gives this error message) I thought I had
> fixed it, and posted a new set of super binary packages to the
> sourceforge release mechanism.
> Thanks, I'll check into it.
> BTW: Was that the super server .rpm or .tar.gz that you used.
> Mark
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see