Subject | Re: [IB-Java] Re: JDBC Development |
---|---|
Author | Mark O'Donohue |
Post date | 2001-04-28T03:00:23Z |
Mark O'Donohue wrote:
before they go out the door would help, its not as good as using Jims
ODBC thing, since that would be direct, and this still uses a socket,
but it does stop having an extra socket hop.
Is it type2? - I think I need to read the manual again, :-), but posted
a quick reply here since Im not entirely sure and wanted to clarrify that.
Sorry for the confussion
Cheers
Mark
Your database needs YOU!
http://firebird.sourceforge.net
>Boy I should sometimes think before I post, perhaps a 1/2 hours delay
> So maybe we already have a type2 solution :-).
before they go out the door would help, its not as good as using Jims
ODBC thing, since that would be direct, and this still uses a socket,
but it does stop having an extra socket hop.
Is it type2? - I think I need to read the manual again, :-), but posted
a quick reply here since Im not entirely sure and wanted to clarrify that.
Sorry for the confussion
Cheers
Mark
> Is that something you--
> want to persue?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I suppose it has been from discusions and experiences that I have had
> both work and
>
> Kelly Harrison wrote:
>
>> -- -----Original Message-----
>> -- But to emphasise again, it's a type 4 driver everyone wants.
>>
>> I'd have to second that opinion.
>>
>> Kelly
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> IB-Java-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
Your database needs YOU!
http://firebird.sourceforge.net