Your right too ...........but my experience of interserver on linux is that is
is not working very well and that a pure java driver would give me
more control and allow me to debug the driver more easily.

//OLAS



Arkadiusz Rychlinski wrote:

> > There has to be a balance between what can be done,
> > anticipated future/architectural needs and what people
> > actually need.
> >
> > I feel the same way about advanced transactional support.
> > I will have limited use for it, if any.
>
> But if people need the only JDBC 1.0 features, the can always use existing
> interserver.
> What is good in creating clone of current driver? Fact, that the new one
> will talk directly
> to database has no advantages to me. I had no problem with installing and
> using interserver.
>
> I my opinion (if I could suggest anything) the new driver should at least
> fully support JDBC 2.0
> what would make it something better than interserver from programmer's point
> of view.
>
> I will try to help develop this new driver.
>
> Arkadiusz Rychlinski
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> IB-Java-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/