Subject | MPL 1.1 multiple license provisions (Was: [IBDI] Which license(s)?) |
---|---|
Author | Roland Turner |
Post date | 2000-03-15T05:00:21Z |
Helen Borrie wrote:
added to the FAQ today (there is no question of a caching problem as (a)
I don't work behind a cache, even a transparent one, (b) my browser
cache is flushed daily and (c) my first visit to these pages was
yesterday), I cannot see the announcement (News? Community Notices?). If
you'd provide the URL (and the navigation path, perhaps I'm looking in
the wrong place), I'd appreciate it.
So, my second and third questions:
provision been considered, and if so, the LGPL?
- Raz
> The announcement about MPL 1.1 has been in the IBDI pages now for some weeks.These would be the interbase2000.org pages? It appears to have been
added to the FAQ today (there is no question of a caching problem as (a)
I don't work behind a cache, even a transparent one, (b) my browser
cache is flushed daily and (c) my first visit to these pages was
yesterday), I cannot see the announcement (News? Community Notices?). If
you'd provide the URL (and the navigation path, perhaps I'm looking in
the wrong place), I'd appreciate it.
So, my second and third questions:
> >- If 1.1, will the multiple-licensed code provisions be utilised? (IWho is making the licensing decision? Has MPL's multiple license
> >hope so.)
> >- If so, is LGPL an option?
provision been considered, and if so, the LGPL?
- Raz