Subject | Re: MPL 1.1 multiple license provisions (Was: [IBDI] Which license(s)?) |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2000-03-15T05:47:12Z |
At 04:00 PM 15-03-00 +1100, you wrote:
several other places, including the announcement of three weeks ago about
the new company and the licence on the home page - this story has now been
moved to the News page.
Also now in FAQ and all over the place in the the Licensing and Topics
discussion pages.
links on the Links Page.
future) made the decision about licensing after lengthy discussions with
the developer community.
It looks as if you have about three months' history to catch up on. :-)
Helen
>From: Roland Turner <raz@...>Correct, it was added to the FAQ today. It has been (and still is) in
>
>Helen Borrie wrote:
>
> > The announcement about MPL 1.1 has been in the IBDI pages now for some
> weeks.
>
>These would be the interbase2000.org pages? It appears to have been
>added to the FAQ today
several other places, including the announcement of three weeks ago about
the new company and the licence on the home page - this story has now been
moved to the News page.
>(there is no question of a caching problem as (a)Now on News (yesterday on Home Page)
>I don't work behind a cache, even a transparent one, (b) my browser
>cache is flushed daily and (c) my first visit to these pages was
>yesterday), I cannot see the announcement
Also now in FAQ and all over the place in the the Licensing and Topics
discussion pages.
>(News? Community Notices?). IfNot necessary. Use the navigation facilities provided.
>you'd provide the URL (and the navigation path, perhaps I'm looking in
>the wrong place), I'd appreciate it.
>So, my second and third questions:You can get all the background to the licensing discussions by taking the
>
> > >- If 1.1, will the multiple-licensed code provisions be utilised? (I
> > >hope so.)
> > >- If so, is LGPL an option?
links on the Links Page.
>Who is making the licensing decision? Has MPL's multiple licenseAll options have been considered. The owners of InterBase (current and
>provision been considered, and if so, the LGPL?
future) made the decision about licensing after lengthy discussions with
the developer community.
It looks as if you have about three months' history to catch up on. :-)
Helen
>- Raz