Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: The POSITION |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2006-10-03T15:36:45Z |
m_theologos wrote:
not a good argument, since there are easy ways to work around it.
However, this:
that you implement it ;)
Windows without problems.
only small pieces of code and wouldn't bloat the server.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://swoes.blogspot.com/
http://www.flamerobin.org
>>>to the market what is needed _now_I was just pointing out that the fact that feature "is needed now" is
not a good argument, since there are easy ways to work around it.
However, this:
> But researching other things, I discovered that the code whichIs a good argument. And you made it look so easy, that Claudio proposed
> POSITION can use is already (in a big proportion) in the code-base
> and I suggested that this can be used to implement, with ease, the
> new function.
that you implement it ;)
> But we must considerAre not 100% cross-platform I'd say. I use STR* UDFs on Linux and
> some things about UDFs:
>
> 1. Are great way to extend with ease your server
> 2. Are not cross-platform
Windows without problems.
> 3. (At least for STRPOS) aren't officialy supported by FirebirdNeither are IBExpert or DBW, but it doesn't mean they are not good.
> foundation.
> 4. Performance penalityMaybe they should be all put in the server then? After all, they are
> 5. Some limitations in some constructs (arguments mainly)
only small pieces of code and wouldn't bloat the server.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://swoes.blogspot.com/
http://www.flamerobin.org