| Subject | Pig Latin, Klingon and Unicode |
|---|---|
| Author | Mike Nordell |
| Post date | 2000-08-02T19:23:54Z |
David Schnepper wrote:
someone was just bored, and since there was no Unicode to write it in
Klingon, it became Pig Latin. :-)
Either way, does anyone on this list have write access to the interbase.com
site? In that case, *and* if removing this translation would prove to make
the download at least 10%-20% smaller, perhaps this could be extracted to a
separate D/L (or if it can be reproduce by the tools, dropped all together)?
Btw, speaking of Unicode, though it probably would be more correct to post
this in IBD it has a connection here: Does ANSI SQL (is 99 the latest?)
mention UC?
/Mike Nordell
> Yes, "pg_PG" is pig-latin as used in "PigLatina". It is what I usedThat somehow explains its presence in the DB. I was lead to believe that
> to test all the translation tools.
someone was just bored, and since there was no Unicode to write it in
Klingon, it became Pig Latin. :-)
Either way, does anyone on this list have write access to the interbase.com
site? In that case, *and* if removing this translation would prove to make
the download at least 10%-20% smaller, perhaps this could be extracted to a
separate D/L (or if it can be reproduce by the tools, dropped all together)?
Btw, speaking of Unicode, though it probably would be more correct to post
this in IBD it has a connection here: Does ANSI SQL (is 99 the latest?)
mention UC?
/Mike Nordell