--- In IB-Architect@egroups.com, "Mike Nordell" <tamlin@a...> wrote:

> Btw, speaking of Unicode, though it probably would be more correct

to post

> this in IBD it has a connection here: Does ANSI SQL (is 99 the

latest?)

> mention UC?
>
> /Mike Nordell

I don't know about the latest ANSI SQL, but SQL 92 had no mention of
Unicode (not surprising, considering the time). It did have
something called the "SQL Character Repertoire". As I recall, it's
the set of characters necessary to represent all keywords & symbols
used in SQL itself. (Gee, no Q or Z needed?)