Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] MSG.gdb |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2000-07-30T22:39:15Z |
I will try to explain, see below:
Renegade Systems become Groton Database (GDB) and then Interbase SW.
Ashton-Tate bought IB on 1991. Few months later, Borland purchased
Ahston-Tate.
Ashton-Tate and Borland owns all the rights, I *think* there's no problem.
you require IB to build IB.
platform-independent code.
as IB itself IMHO. Don't know what are you reading really and what's the
purpose of this stuff.
C.
---------
Claudio Valderrama C.
Ingeniero en Informática - Consultor independiente
http://members.tripod.com/cvalde
> -----Original Message-----Yes, if you read the Roadmap in my site, you'll know that an interim
> From: Mike Nordell [mailto:tamlin@...]
> Sent: Domingo 30 de Julio de 2000 7:54
>
> While looking through the IB tree to clean up compiler warnings
> and stuff, I
> had a look at the contents of MSG.gdb.
>
> It has data that contains the following:
> "Copyright (c) 1985, 1994 by Borland International, Inc." and
> "copyright (c) 1984, 1990 by Interbase Software Corporation"
> which got me wondering if
>
> 1. Did ISC existed both 1984 and 1990?
Renegade Systems become Groton Database (GDB) and then Interbase SW.
Ashton-Tate bought IB on 1991. Few months later, Borland purchased
Ahston-Tate.
> 2. Is this database is covered by the IPL?Good question. Since ISC legally disappeared when it was absorbed by
Ashton-Tate and Borland owns all the rights, I *think* there's no problem.
> IMO it should be, since it contains parts of the IB source, butMaybe it's because IB is like an egg and a chicken or like Delphi itself:
> on the other
> hand I believe the IPL only covers source code and the DB is a
> binary file.
you require IB to build IB.
> Since the opening of the source seem to have been quite infected byAfter all, only Inprise can make the legal statements.
> politics, and people apparently gets screwed left and right by Inprice, it
> might be a problem.
> This DB also contains source code for a bunch of languages (e.g.Can't comment. There're things that are used by GPRE to create
> C, PASCAL),
> and I guess it's code that gpre uses to create compilable files from e.g.
> ".e" files. If this is a correct guess, wouldn't it be better to
> move these
> source into text-strings the source of gpre?
platform-independent code.
> I also found qute a few message string that seems to be of no relevance toUtilities like isql and gbak read their messages from interbase.msg, same
> the DB itself, e.g. what seems to explain command-line parameters for some
> program(s). If they are, I think they also should be migrated
> into the src.
as IB itself IMHO. Don't know what are you reading really and what's the
purpose of this stuff.
C.
---------
Claudio Valderrama C.
Ingeniero en Informática - Consultor independiente
http://members.tripod.com/cvalde