Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] CVS guru? |
---|---|
Author | Mark O'Donohue |
Post date | 2000-07-30T16:50:48Z |
Oliver Sturm wrote:
need to do a checkout anyway. In all it's going to be easier to just check out
the new repository - but that's new and I wouldn't be supprised if it changes a
bit before it settles down as well.
So I'd suggest stay with the files for now, and wait till you really need
something or really want to put something back.
enthusiastic.
I wouldn't be too worried about dramatic change.
For starters everyone is paranoid about the changes not being able to put through
the test suite (mind you it's a good idea to be paranoid about).
I guess the InterClient stuff will be where most people want to make immediate
changes.
Regards
Mark
> Hallo Mark,Yeh you can do it, but to get the "right" CVS files from the other repository you
>
> Am Sonntag, 30. Juli 2000 um 15:37:20, haben Sie geschrieben:
>
> >> Hm. I thought I might be able to use the stuff from the tgz files as a
> >> starting point, as they should be identical at this point to the stuff
> >> in the cvs at mers. Then later, I can get up to date easily by
> >> synchronizing. But you say there's no way telling CVS "here's what I
> >> got now, compare for changes and get me what I haven't got"?
> >>
>
> > The trouble is that the source files are identical but the stuff in the
> > CVS directories will be differnet, the ones in the .tar.gz files will point
> > to (and contain details about) file versions and directories in the
> > interbase.com CVS repositry.
>
> And if I delete those?
>
need to do a checkout anyway. In all it's going to be easier to just check out
the new repository - but that's new and I wouldn't be supprised if it changes a
bit before it settles down as well.
So I'd suggest stay with the files for now, and wait till you really need
something or really want to put something back.
>Well it being the early hours on a Monday morning here :(, and Im not as
> > Since the source files are identical, and at this early stage, the main thing
> > that is going to change is the build and make stuff, you might as well work
> > on the files you've got, then when you are happy with it you can do some
> > directory diffs etc then to work out exactly what you want to checkin to
> > mers.
>
> I'm not sure whether or when I'm going to check in anything into that
> repository. But I think it's the easiest way of keeping track with the
> loads of daily changes that are going to be happening. (Being
> enthusiastic on a Sunday ;)
>
enthusiastic.
I wouldn't be too worried about dramatic change.
For starters everyone is paranoid about the changes not being able to put through
the test suite (mind you it's a good idea to be paranoid about).
I guess the InterClient stuff will be where most people want to make immediate
changes.
Regards
Mark