Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] SuperServer vs. Classic |
---|---|
Author | Dominique Louis |
Post date | 2000-06-03T08:01:42Z |
Doug Chamberlin wrote:
dicision or would make a big difference. I was simply illustrating that my
application could make use of having the best of both Interbase worlds.
reach as high as 600 when it is fully implemented company wide.
sure many other developer's applications ) can take advantages of both
achitectures. Obviously I could drop classic and standardise on SS, but if
each has an advantage and I want to give the client the best his money can
buy then giving him the best DB for both local and server is what I think I
should do.
Ciao,
Dominique Louis
Delphi Developer and aspiring Delphi Game Developer.
*********************************************************
** To Do Nothing is to Collaborate with the oppressor **
** -------------------------------------------------- **
** I like my reality undiluted! **
*********************************************************
=========================================================
Company. . . . . . : Savage Software Solutions
Web Site . . . . . : http://www.SavageSoftware.com.au
Delphi Games Site. : http://www.SavageSoftware.com.au/delphi
G4D Mirrror Site . : http://www.SavageSoftware.com.au/delphi/g4d
Delphi JEDI Site . : http://www.delphi-jedi.org
=========================================================
> Maybe my applications and databases are too small for it to make aMaybe I didn't express myself very well. It is obviously not a major
> difference, but I have not understood why this would be a major decision or
> make a big difference.
dicision or would make a big difference. I was simply illustrating that my
application could make use of having the best of both Interbase worlds.
>I can see if you would be pushing the 200+ userInitially the server database will accomodate 200+ users and this will
> operational limits or if you needed multiple CPUs on the server for other
> reasons. For most of what I see this issue just does not come up!
reach as high as 600 when it is fully implemented company wide.
> Dominique, have you actually observed a problem with either architectureAs mentioned no, I just wanted to illustrate that my application ( and I'm
> that makes you want to use one over the other, given your specific
> application and typical database?
sure many other developer's applications ) can take advantages of both
achitectures. Obviously I could drop classic and standardise on SS, but if
each has an advantage and I want to give the client the best his money can
buy then giving him the best DB for both local and server is what I think I
should do.
Ciao,
Dominique Louis
Delphi Developer and aspiring Delphi Game Developer.
*********************************************************
** To Do Nothing is to Collaborate with the oppressor **
** -------------------------------------------------- **
** I like my reality undiluted! **
*********************************************************
=========================================================
>From . . . . . . . : Dominique LouisEmail. . . . . . . : Dominique@...
Company. . . . . . : Savage Software Solutions
Web Site . . . . . : http://www.SavageSoftware.com.au
Delphi Games Site. : http://www.SavageSoftware.com.au/delphi
G4D Mirrror Site . : http://www.SavageSoftware.com.au/delphi/g4d
Delphi JEDI Site . : http://www.delphi-jedi.org
=========================================================