|Subject||Re: [IBO] IBO - IB_String vs AnsiString|
> A quick (and dirty) fix would be to change the declarations, whereIf IBO says it supports D2009, people would expect proper Unicode
> possible, to 'AnsiString' (what Jason did in 4.9 Alpha) but this cuts
> down the Unicode advantage. Which can be very problematic, especially
> when we think from user experience POV (imagine that one user enters in
> the 'Search' box some Unicode characters which happens to _not_ map to
> the current Windows code page and the program show an icy "Not Found" or
> throws an exception).
support, not just "it compiles, ship it"-support for plain old AnsiString.
That explains a lot though, as to why Jason was this quick to release an
Alpha version... I was amazed.
Download Database Workbench for Oracle, MS SQL Server, Sybase SQL
Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase, NexusDB and Firebird!
Database questions? Check the forum: