Subject | Re: [IBO] Suggestion For Next Subrelease |
---|---|
Author | Paul Hope |
Post date | 2003-04-18T08:43:27Z |
I would like to see this as well. It would also make it easier to choose if
the debugger should trace into the IBO code.
Regards
Paul
the debugger should trace into the IBO code.
Regards
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rade Vojvodic" <rvojvodic@...>
To: "IBO Discusion Group (E-mail)" <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 8:16 AM
Subject: [IBO] Suggestion For Next Subrelease
> Hi all,
>
> In my opinion structure of the files needs some changes. All compiled
units
> need to be separated from source units because if you compile your project
> you won't compile IBO units again and again. So i suggest that Jason
should
> add Library folder in the current structure and set Unit uotput directory
to
> .\Library. Building your own project is much faster this way. Another
reason
> is that you are able to change Login dialog form (for example) and to put
it
> to Library folder so next subrelease wouldn't overwrite it with the
default
> one. The same is with IB_Constants unit etc.
>
> P.S.
> Has anyoune worked with JEDI components. I saw that they made some
> installation batch file. Is it possible to make similar for IBO.
>
> Rade Vojvodic
> MIS
> Development and Employment Foundation
> Republika Srpska
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> IB Objects - direct, complete, custom connectivity to Firebird or
InterBase
> without the need for BDE, ODBC or any other layer.
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> http://www.ibobjects.com - your IBO community resource for Tech Info
papers,
> keyword-searchable FAQ, community code contributions and more !
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>