Subject | Re: [IBO] What you think about this ! |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2003-02-24T17:41:56Z |
I fail to recognize what you are suggesting.
Is there a question or suggestion I am missing?
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --
"Alexandre Perestrelo" <delphi@...> wrote in message
news:b35iu7$jai$1@......
Is there a question or suggestion I am missing?
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --
"Alexandre Perestrelo" <delphi@...> wrote in message
news:b35iu7$jai$1@......
> Side Note: IBObjects permits datasets to be defined with theirin
> IB_Transaction property left as '<default>' - like the "Auto Query Grid"
> the demonstration. This causes each dataset to create its own internal"quick
> transaction (named as "tr" + dataset.name) with AutoCommit = true and
> Isolation = tiCommitted. This capability can be useful when building
> and dirty" example applications but I would not recommend this approachfor
> real-world applications. It is generally much better to define explicit
> transactions so that changes from more than one dataset can be managed
> through a particular transaction operating as required for the particular
> application. (You can prevent the use of '<default>' transactions by
> setting TIB_SessionProps.AllowDefaultTransaction = false - which can be
> useful in ensuring that you dont "forget" to explicity define a dataset's
> transaction property.)
>
> Alexandre Perestrelo