Subject | Re: [IBO] Two databases in same project |
---|---|
Author | stanw1950 |
Post date | 2002-01-01T20:45:01Z |
--- In IBObjects@y..., Geoff Worboys <geoff@t...> wrote:
group. I will say that I have had no problem with the delay when
using BDE. I guess there are some things the BDE does better then
IBObjects. All I did was the quick conversion from BDE to IBObjects
with greplace as was recommended in the guide. It's possible there is
some quirk with my home computer. I've always suspected there was
something not quite right about it. Thanks.
> > It takes over 30 seconds to open the first tibotable (databasethe
> > connected property previously set to true early in the code) in
> > second database. Once it is opened, it can be closed and openedto
> > repeatedly in under a second.
>
> Is there any obvious complexity differences between the first and
> second database (or the particular table of the second database)?
>
> IBO does have some overheads when first connecting to a table (due
> loading various metadata details), and this can cause a noticableThanks for the replies. I kind of thought this was the ib support
> delay in very complex databases.
>
> I cant think of any other reason for the problem, so I concur with
> Helen, check in the IB_Support group to see if any others have
> difficulties making two connections from Win98.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> --
> Geoff Worboys
> Telesis Computing
group. I will say that I have had no problem with the delay when
using BDE. I guess there are some things the BDE does better then
IBObjects. All I did was the quick conversion from BDE to IBObjects
with greplace as was recommended in the guide. It's possible there is
some quirk with my home computer. I've always suspected there was
something not quite right about it. Thanks.