Please use the latter way since the first change actually fixes an important
bug.

Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Serge" <skanovka@...>
To: "Jason Wharton" <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:50 AM
Subject: [IBO] Re: New sub-release posted to all areas


> Jason,
>
> This worked out also.
>
> Wednesday, May 16, 2001, 2:14:05 PM, you wrote:
>
> JW> Another thing that should work just fine as well would be to leave it
with
> JW> my fix as was implemented in the 36Df sub-release and comment out just
one
> JW> single line of code that I forgot about which isn't necessary and is
most
> JW> likely responsible for the performance hit.
>
> JW> constructor TIB_Component.Create( AOwner: TComponent );
> JW> begin
> JW> FHasNilAncestry := ( not Assigned( AOwner )) or
> JW> (( AOwner is TIB_Component ) and
> JW> ( AOwner as TIB_Component ).FHasNilAncestry );
> JW> inherited Create( AOwner );
> JW> // Comment out this line of code.
> JW> // CheckSession( false );
> JW> end;
>
> JW> I would really appreciate those of you who have applied the new
sub-release
> JW> and noticed this slow down to try commenting out this line and tell me
if it
> JW> speeds things up. I'm sure that it will but I would also like to know
if
> JW> there are any other problems that result. I ran through a bunch of my
apps
> JW> testing it and it does indeed seem to be unnecessary to do this call
to
> JW> CheckSession.
>
> JW> Please confirm ASAP.
>
>
> Serge
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>