Subject | Re: [IBO] Kylix |
---|---|
Author | Svein Erling Tysvær |
Post date | 2001-05-08T08:06:16Z |
Agree with Carlos, knowing the normal IBO quality it sounds like great
work. One question, though:
www.ud.com to use the idle time of our computers for cancer research? I.e.
low priority processes that "replaces" the System Idle Process. Will this
mess up the entire transaction OAT management?
(Only a theoretical question, www.ud.com isn't in touch with our internal
network - and I've got a separate machine for the internet not using IBO.)
Set
work. One question, though:
>Instead of using a timer on the session to fuel things like automaticthat
>Transaction OAT management I have designed and implemented an architecture
>hooks you right into the IDLE cpu message notifications from windows. ThisWhat if some of us actually followed the OT here some time ago and allowed
>produces much more fluid and efficient handling of background tasks that IBO
>relies upon happening.
www.ud.com to use the idle time of our computers for cancer research? I.e.
low priority processes that "replaces" the System Idle Process. Will this
mess up the entire transaction OAT management?
(Only a theoretical question, www.ud.com isn't in touch with our internal
network - and I've got a separate machine for the internet not using IBO.)
Set