Subject Re: [IBO] Kylix
Author Jason Wharton
No, it won't mess things up. Each process gets idle notifications. IBO's
passive processing yields generously and Windows shares between processes
amply such that there shouldn't be a problem.

Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Svein Erling Tysvær" <svein.erling.tysvaer@...>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [IBO] Kylix

> Agree with Carlos, knowing the normal IBO quality it sounds like great
> work. One question, though:
> >Instead of using a timer on the session to fuel things like automatic
> >Transaction OAT management I have designed and implemented an
> that
> >hooks you right into the IDLE cpu message notifications from windows.
> >produces much more fluid and efficient handling of background tasks that
> >relies upon happening.
> What if some of us actually followed the OT here some time ago and allowed
> to use the idle time of our computers for cancer research? I.e.
> low priority processes that "replaces" the System Idle Process. Will this
> mess up the entire transaction OAT management?
> (Only a theoretical question, isn't in touch with our internal
> network - and I've got a separate machine for the internet not using IBO.)
> Set
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to