Subject | Re: [IBO] IBO speed vs BDE?: Kaputnik |
---|---|
Author | Chuck Belanger |
Post date | 2001-04-18T09:32:08Z |
Nick:
That was a great answer, thanks!
And you're right, it has been taking me a while to get over the habit of
thinking in terms of local hard disk based tables as in FoxPro. With IB
everything is returned as a "cursor" as we called it in FoxPro.
As we progress in this project I will definitely be asking the IB community
about specifics.
Right now, do you have any suggestions as to where I could go to learn more
basic information about optimizing IB? Remember we are using IB on a local
system only (and I keep wanting to think of it as a FoxPro-like database, which
it isn't.)
Thanks again,
Chuck Belanger
p.s. I guess the real question is why did the original programmer use IB for
local data, when it may have been faster to use dBase or Paradox? BTW, I have no
idea!
That was a great answer, thanks!
And you're right, it has been taking me a while to get over the habit of
thinking in terms of local hard disk based tables as in FoxPro. With IB
everything is returned as a "cursor" as we called it in FoxPro.
As we progress in this project I will definitely be asking the IB community
about specifics.
Right now, do you have any suggestions as to where I could go to learn more
basic information about optimizing IB? Remember we are using IB on a local
system only (and I keep wanting to think of it as a FoxPro-like database, which
it isn't.)
Thanks again,
Chuck Belanger
p.s. I guess the real question is why did the original programmer use IB for
local data, when it may have been faster to use dBase or Paradox? BTW, I have no
idea!