Subject | RE: [IBO] More than one Lookup combo to one dataset |
---|---|
Author | Michael L. Horne |
Post date | 2001-03-14T19:47:12Z |
Jason,
What do you mean the Lookup() method. On the Dataset?
How do we use that, and where?
What do you mean the Lookup() method. On the Dataset?
How do we use that, and where?
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> sentto-402930-4894-984598056-guardian=pobox.com@...
> [mailto:sentto-402930-4894-984598056-guardian=pobox.com@....
> com]On Behalf Of Jason Wharton
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:24 PM
> To: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [IBO] More than one Lookup combo to one dataset
>
>
> Have you considered using the Lookup( ) method to supply these
> values from a
> single table?
> Lookup( ) doesn't mess around with the current position of the record
> pointer so it can fill the needs of many different sources. This is how it
> works with LookupFields in the VCL.
>
> HTH,
> Jason Wharton
> CPS - Mesa AZ
> http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc Leclerc" <mlpgr@...>
> To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [IBO] More than one Lookup combo to one dataset
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > My initial problem for asking this question is that I have a
> table with a
> > list of names and a table that uses those names for fields such as
> > ReceivedBy, ApprovedBy, ForwardedTo, DecisionBy,... What I have
> to do now
> is
> > set many queries (one for each field) and I though there could
> be a better
> > way such a cloning one dataset in order to reduce the number of queries
> that
> > need to be executed. The table, as mentionned earlier, are
> fairly small so
> > the impact is not so bad for this case, but I was wondering what I could
> do
> > if the table were big.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>