Why not simply a TIB_Query that has only client-side calculated fields? The
syntax for IBO-calculated fields resembles the declarations in SQL, so the
needed step seems to use a special table name that IBO knows it shouldn't
try to match in the server.

C.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Svein Erling Tysvær
> [mailto:svein.erling.tysvaer@...]
> Sent: Miércoles 6 de Diciembre de 2000 3:51
>
> Geoff & Jason,
>
> I have never used anything vaguely resembling in-memory tables, but why
> support this at the SQL level?
>
> I think it would be more logical to support this at the connection level -
> probably through a Boolean property InMemory or something. Any CREATE
> TABLE, SELECT etc. done to datasets associated with such a connection
> should be done in memory. Maybe a bit difficult for you two to implement,
> but easy for us developers to use ;=} It may be stretching it a bit far to
> implement support for in-memory triggers and generators, though.
>
> Set