> A> How much infrastructure would your tools need to recognize
> A> and work with such tables?
>
> if you are talking about completely dynamic tables (both structure and
> data exist in the context of one attachment or transaction, as per
> Volker's request), then I don't think there's much FlameRobin would
> want to do with them.

Same here. I don't see the point in creating a temp-table via the
Table Editor.

With regards,

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server.
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com

> Or are you talking about static structures (i.e. listed in
> RDB$RELATIONS and visible to all) with temp data, as was described
> some time ago on the Architecture list?