> If you develop or are considering developing an interface
> tool that works with Firebird, I'd like your ideas about
> temporary tables. There's a discussion of creating temporary
> tables that are visible to a single attachment, persist
> across transactions, and are deleted with the attachment
> exits.
>
> How much infrastructure would your tools need to recognize
> and work with such tables?

Another thought...

In order to get temp-tables recognized into SQL-insight or
other stuff, they would hae to show up in RDB$RELATIONS...

With regards,

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server.
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com