Subject Re: [firebird-tools] Temporary tables and interfaces
Author Nando Dessena

A> How much infrastructure would your tools need to recognize
A> and work with such tables?

if you are talking about completely dynamic tables (both structure and
data exist in the context of one attachment or transaction, as per
Volker's request), then I don't think there's much FlameRobin would
want to do with them.

Or are you talking about static structures (i.e. listed in
RDB$RELATIONS and visible to all) with temp data, as was described
some time ago on the Architecture list?

Nando Dessena