Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Oldest transaction far behind... |
---|---|
Author | Norman Dunbar |
Post date | 2011-03-22T20:32:46Z |
Evening Vlad,
OST and OIT but everything I've ever seen on the matter has alwayss said
it's the difference between OAT and OIT.
However, if they are the same value (OST and OAT) then it is effectively
the same. It's only when OST != OAT that there may be a subtle different
in which version to use.
Cheers,
Norman.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Thorpe House
61 Richardshaw Lane
Pudsey
West Yorkshire
United Kingdom
LS28 7EL
Company Number: 05132767
> Really, you should consider OST-OIT, not OAT-OIT, because of :Now, that's what I always thought of as correct the difference between
>
>> The oldest snapshot transaction (OST) is normally the same as the OAT
>> and indicated, basically, the transaction number beyond which a sweep
>> will not clear out "garbage".
OST and OIT but everything I've ever seen on the matter has alwayss said
it's the difference between OAT and OIT.
However, if they are the same value (OST and OAT) then it is effectively
the same. It's only when OST != OAT that there may be a subtle different
in which version to use.
Cheers,
Norman.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Thorpe House
61 Richardshaw Lane
Pudsey
West Yorkshire
United Kingdom
LS28 7EL
Company Number: 05132767