Subject | Re: Oldest transaction far behind... |
---|---|
Author | hvlad |
Post date | 2011-03-22T18:37:22Z |
> You need to consider the difference between the Oldest InterestingReally, you should consider OST-OIT, not OAT-OIT, because of :
> Transaction (OIT) and the Oldest Active Transaction (OAT). If the
> difference between those two is greater than the sweep interval, the
> sweep will automatically run and clear "garbage" from the database.
> The oldest snapshot transaction (OST) is normally the same as the OATRegards,
> and indicated, basically, the transaction number beyond which a sweep
> will not clear out "garbage".
Vlad