At 09:05 AM 2/02/2011, Claudio Romero wrote:

>**but SuperClassic is designed for 64bit, not for 32
>but both (SS y SC) are in 32 bits, and there are a big diference.

You miss the point. Yes, you can configure 32-bit Classic to run as Superclassic but there is no point: Superclassic is designed to take advantage of resources that are available to 64-bit applications on a 64-bit OS and NOT AVAILABLE on a 32-bit OS....so:

1) running 32-bit SC on a 32-bit OS --> pointless
2) running 32-bit SC on a 64-bit OS --> pointless

>Even Firebird 2.1.4 SuperServer is faster (76 seg)

In case you didn't know, v.2.1.x has 32-bit and 64-bit flavours.

>I will create and upload an database for do it this test.
>I try test with Firebird 64 bits too.

First, for your own satisfaction, create test environments that compare apples with apples and oranges with oranges.

Forget the idea of running a 32-bit Superclassic on any platform as a realistic alternative to Firebird *anything-else*. At best, your tests will merely get you some more empirical support for that advice. ;-)

./heLen

>Thanks
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
>on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
>Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>