Subject | Superclassic slower than Superserver |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Romero |
Post date | 2011-01-31T02:21:44Z |
Hello
I test one stored procedure (read only select)
Windows 7 AMD 3 CPU 4 GB RAM
database 1.34 GB ods 11.1
Firebird 2.5.1 svn 26182 32 bits
SuperClassic (fb_inet_server -a -m) 108 seg
SuperServer (fbserver -a) 80 seg
The data are read from Windows cache.(I repeat the test)
Why SuperClassic is slower than SuperServer
Any idea?
Regards
I test one stored procedure (read only select)
Windows 7 AMD 3 CPU 4 GB RAM
database 1.34 GB ods 11.1
Firebird 2.5.1 svn 26182 32 bits
SuperClassic (fb_inet_server -a -m) 108 seg
SuperServer (fbserver -a) 80 seg
The data are read from Windows cache.(I repeat the test)
Why SuperClassic is slower than SuperServer
Any idea?
Regards