| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Superclassic slower than Superserver |
|---|---|
| Author | Philippe Makowski |
| Post date | 2011-02-01T17:30:29Z |
2011/1/31 Claudio Romero <clauslack@...>
but SuperClassic is designed for 64bit, not for 32
>without the test it self hard to say
>
>
> Hello
> I test one stored procedure (read only select)
> Windows 7 AMD 3 CPU 4 GB RAM
> database 1.34 GB ods 11.1
> Firebird 2.5.1 svn 26182 32 bits
>
> SuperClassic (fb_inet_server -a -m) 108 seg
> SuperServer (fbserver -a) 80 seg
> The data are read from Windows cache.(I repeat the test)
>
> Why SuperClassic is slower than SuperServer
>
> Any idea?
but SuperClassic is designed for 64bit, not for 32