Subject | Re: commit after insert is very slow (bis - new thread) |
---|---|
Author | svanderclock |
Post date | 2010-03-06T08:41:10Z |
hmmm, that could be a VERY GOOD THING TO KNOW if we can definitively confirm it (microsoft say to never disable the pagefile.sys so before to disable it i want to be absolutely sure)
how to study the pagefile.sys (the memory file swap) activity to be absolutely sure ? I have 32 GB of memory and 35GB for the pagefile.sys
thanks by advance
stephane
how to study the pagefile.sys (the memory file swap) activity to be absolutely sure ? I have 32 GB of memory and 35GB for the pagefile.sys
thanks by advance
stephane
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Slavomir Skopalik" <skopalik@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> on Windows, mainly on Win64 we have this experience:
> OS are trying to do best posible file caching and putting FB cache into swap
> file.
> This typically starting when DB size is over ~80% of RAM.
> Our final solution was simple, we was disable swap.
>
> This solution radicaly improove system reaction time.
> We don't receive any problem with memory (all machone has more then 8GB
> RAM).
>
> This mean, try to look how many RAM is used for file caching.
>
> Slavek
> Ing. Slavomir Skopalik
> Jednatel spolecnosti
> Elekt Labs s.r.o.
> Chaloupky 158
> 783 72 Velky Tynec
> Czech Republic
> --------------------------------------------
> Mobil: +420 724 207 851
> icq:199 118 333
> e-mail:skopalik@...
> http://www.elektlabs.cz
>
>
>
>
>
>
> hmm, how 100 000 page buffer can make me run out of physical memory ? with
> 4ko page buffer, it's only 400 mb of memory and i have 4gb on our test
> machine.
>
> but anyway that was a good remarque (and a good guess) and it's look
> logical. how to know if a program go into a memoy disk swap hell ?
>
> thanks again ann !
> stephane
>
> --- In firebird-support@ <mailto:firebird-support%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison" <aharrison@> wrote:
> >
> > svanderclock wrote:
> > > no one have an idea of this behavior ?
> > >> now i encountered another strange behavior, it's when i setup a big
> page buffer
> > >>
> > >> page buffer 2048: execute time 156ms
> > >> page buffer 20480: execute time 156ms
> > >> page buffer 100000: execute time 15288 ms !!!
> > >>
> > >> any idea why when i setup a big page buffer then the execute time go
> down by 100 ! the commit time don't change..
> > >>
> > >> many thanks by advance for your precious help !!
> >
> > My guess is that at 100,000 page buffers, you've run out
> > of physical memory and are page faulting. Tuning a database
> > is a little like cooking - the fact that a bit of salt improves
> > the flavor doesn't imply that a kilo of salt will make it
> > delicious.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ann
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>