Subject | Re: Firebird for big projects |
---|---|
Author | svanderclock |
Post date | 2009-12-03T21:01:03Z |
same for me
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Max Renshaw-Fox" <maxrf@...> wrote:
>
> We run firebird databases approx half the size (Tables Triggers & SPs) but
> similar in connections 200-300 and transactions 1,000,000 - 1,500,000 per
> day on classic on quadcore - windows with good results.
>
> We find RAM is more important than CPU (but maybe not so with more SPs)
> averaging 5Gb - 7Gb depending on load - cpu use is usually < 10%.
>
> Our experience is that database & application design is more important
> than firebird limits. We've tweaked firebird.conf - but not much.
>
> The only issue we haven't resolved is occasional (zombie) connections that
> don't go away despite having no client - but we haven't put enough effort
> into resolving our side yet - so can't blame firebird.
>
> Max
>
> > Sorry, i also would like to know if FB will support this and if any one
> > has experience with hihg data volume and this amount of users.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
>