Subject | Re: Database corruption (again) or what is wrong with Firebird. |
---|---|
Author | thisllub |
Post date | 2008-06-24T23:59:25Z |
"I don't see how you can say that. Firebird runs in plenty of "serious
corruption is irrelevant. Any database is corruptible.The fact that
corruption can be undetected and virtually unrecoverable is the problem.
I am not slagging off at the product here. I am very happy with
everything else about Firebird. I just consider this to be a serious
issue.
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dean Harding
<dean.harding@...> wrote:
> production environment"s without the corruption you describe. "A single corruption makes that a false statement. The cause of the
corruption is irrelevant. Any database is corruptible.The fact that
corruption can be undetected and virtually unrecoverable is the problem.
I am not slagging off at the product here. I am very happy with
everything else about Firebird. I just consider this to be a serious
issue.
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dean Harding
<dean.harding@...> wrote:
>
> thisllub wrote:
> > You wrote;
> > "> ..in *your* production environment...right? Firebird databases
> > don't corrupt in a "serious production environment" but it sounds as
> > if you are over a barrel now and it's too late for you to approach
> > (with us) what is happening in *your* environment to cause this
> > corruption."
> >
> > Of course you are wrong.
>
> I don't see how you can say that. Firebird runs in plenty of "serious
> production environment"s without the corruption you describe. I think
> that was the point Helen was trying to make. Something about *your
> particular environment* is different and that is what is causing the
> trouble.
>
> Dean.
>