Subject | Firebird 3, superclassic, what the mistake ? |
---|---|
Author | svanderclock |
Post date | 2008-12-28T14:37:18Z |
hello,
i see in http://www.sinatica.com/blog/en/index.php/articles/firebird-
superserver-classicserver-or-superclassic, that the firebird 3 will
be build on the architecture of the Firebird 2 classic !
Does it's mean that the cache will be "not shared" like it's show on
the picture : http://www.sinatica.com/blog/br/wp-
content/uploads/image/pages/2008/07/SuperClassicDiagram.png accross
all the clients connections ????
as far as i understand, FB 3 superClassic = FB 2 classic with thread
instead of Process !
so as we have more than 300 concurrents connexions, does it's mean
that some memory cache will be dedicated for all theses
connections ??? everytime on connection is open / close, does it's
also mean that memory cache will be initialised / released ?
thanks you by advance
stephane
i see in http://www.sinatica.com/blog/en/index.php/articles/firebird-
superserver-classicserver-or-superclassic, that the firebird 3 will
be build on the architecture of the Firebird 2 classic !
Does it's mean that the cache will be "not shared" like it's show on
the picture : http://www.sinatica.com/blog/br/wp-
content/uploads/image/pages/2008/07/SuperClassicDiagram.png accross
all the clients connections ????
as far as i understand, FB 3 superClassic = FB 2 classic with thread
instead of Process !
so as we have more than 300 concurrents connexions, does it's mean
that some memory cache will be dedicated for all theses
connections ??? everytime on connection is open / close, does it's
also mean that memory cache will be initialised / released ?
thanks you by advance
stephane