Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird == Standard SQL ??? |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Jimenez |
Post date | 2007-08-01T00:04:09Z |
Hi Adam,
The reasoned I was asking is because I am lazy, and I have the need to
convert a MS SQl DB to Firebird, and I did not want to go creating domains
to cater for the missing types. But more importantly, having to change
legacy code for the new firebird DB. However the more I look into the MS SQL
the more issues I have found, such as using reserved words for fields etc.
None the less, thank you for the suggestions
daniel
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The reasoned I was asking is because I am lazy, and I have the need to
convert a MS SQl DB to Firebird, and I did not want to go creating domains
to cater for the missing types. But more importantly, having to change
legacy code for the new firebird DB. However the more I look into the MS SQL
the more issues I have found, such as using reserved words for fields etc.
None the less, thank you for the suggestions
daniel
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]