|Subject||Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 2.0 and the ROWS clause|
> > As I'm going through the huge document called "Release Notes" forThanks.
> > Firebird 2.0, I noticed ROWS being implemented. Would I be
> > correct as to say that it doesn't include the optional [WITH TIES]
> > clause?
> Correct, we didn't implement WITH TIES.
Database Workbench - development tool for Firebird and more!
Database development questions? Check the forum!