| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 2.0 and the ROWS clause |
|---|---|
| Author | Dmitry Yemanov |
| Post date | 2006-11-08T16:03:08Z |
Martijn Tonies wrote:
Dmitry
>Correct, we didn't implement WITH TIES.
> As I'm going through the huge document called "Release Notes" for
> Firebird 2.0, I noticed ROWS being implemented. Would I be
> correct as to say that it doesn't include the optional [WITH TIES]
> clause?
Dmitry