|Subject||Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 2.0 and the ROWS clause|
Martijn Tonies wrote:
>Correct, we didn't implement WITH TIES.
> As I'm going through the huge document called "Release Notes" for
> Firebird 2.0, I noticed ROWS being implemented. Would I be
> correct as to say that it doesn't include the optional [WITH TIES]